Court Case over Fabricated Data

The email below was forwarded to me.  I’m in the process of obtaining more information from JIR Group and hope to report back soon with more details.  For now I’ll just comment that this looks like a case of incredibly crude and clumsy fabrication.

 

Market Research Firm Wins Falsified Data Lawsuit

 

Las Vegas and Portland, Ore. – (April 4, 2016) – Las Vegas marketing research firm James Industry Research Group (JIR Group) recently won an unprecedented claim against Las Vegas-based Carol Greco DBA Ansel Consumer Research and Ansel Business Resources for falsification of data and related damages.

“Data integrity in our research means everything to us and to our clients. The clients we work with are making important business decisions based on the data our firm provides, and we take that very seriously,” says JIR Group Director of Research Jocelyn Thomas. “Ultimately, real jobs and real futures are at stake, so we feel the quality of our research defines us as a company. Companies who fabricate research data to us are likely to do it to others, and we feel a responsibility to challenge their place in our industry. So, we took action.”

In 2015, Ansel Research was subcontracted to assist with marketing research data collection for Las Vegas-based public opinion research. During it’s quality assurance control procedures, JIR Group employees discovered gross misrepresentation of respondent data and challenged the integrity of the results being provided by Ansel. A full investigation by JIR Group resulted in all of the research by Ansel being discredited due to changed responses, failure to ever be actually surveyed, and falsified data. “We essentially threw out all of Ansel’s data and re-did the research on our own dime,” says Thomas.

“Making the decision to redo and replace the research for our client was easy, but making the decision to sue and risk our own assets was difficult,” says Jim James, founder of JIR Group. “Many discouraged us, saying that a lawsuit ‘wasn’t worth making trouble,’ and that ‘data integrity wouldn’t matter to the court.’ I disagreed; our commitment to our clients and employees is always worth the trouble.”
JIR Group took a unique approach to the court, seeking compensation for the additional labor and resources they incurred, the money required to pay cancelled participants, and the ethical violations identified across multiple marketing research associations. Carol Greco and Ansel Research counter-sued, but the court found for James Industry Research Group in both lawsuits and awards.

“We believe that cheating is wrong, and this was an opportunity to show our commitment to integrity,” explains James. “We’ve seen this type of data fabrication previously, and that’s what led us to start our own company in the first place – our commitment to doing market research the right way. We want our employees to be proud to work here, and our clients to know they can trust our research.” James hopes that his company’s high standards are an example to other market research companies as well.

“I’m happy to provide the roadmap for how we presented our case to the court,” says James. “When companies within our industry operate without data integrity, it’s a detriment to all of us in marketing research, and it hurts the industries and working people that depend on accurate data for accurate decisions. We’re dedicated to doing it right, and aren’t afraid to fight for that.”

Advertisements

One thought on “Court Case over Fabricated Data

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s